|more things that don't seem to add up in Berg case.
||[May. 19th, 2004|12:19 am]
|||||Muslimgauze - Jerusalem Artichoke||]|
A user on this message board, summed some of the bits of cracks and pieces of this controversial side of the Berg beheading case. At the bottm of his post are useful sites with further info on the matter FYI.
Article on tribe board here: http://www.tribemagazine.com/board/showthread.php?s=&threadid=67991&highlight=berg+video+false.
Points of Discrepancy</b></u>
1) Most people replied by asserting that the execution occurred as retribution to the abuse photos that had surfaced, but you have to ask yourself - do these terrorists, who are clearly capable of brainwashing people to the point where they are willing to kill and be killed for their beliefs, really have no concept of political tact? Here they are, the whole world screaming at the US for hypocrisy and injustice over these pictures, and they perform and publish this execution right in the heat of the scandal. In other words, these masters of brainwashing and spin and deception release a video of a despicable act just as the US, their sworn enemy, is being globally grilled. Does this make sense to you?
2) Second, I wonder what the standard issue chair is at Abu Ghraib prison?
(In link 2 pics one of Lynndie England the other of N.Berg sitting in the same type of plastic lawn chair)
3) Is it not interesting that the wall colour at Abu Ghraib prison is identical to that of the video?
4) Is it not also interesting that Berg is wearing the same orange jumpsuit worn by prisoners at Abu Ghraib prison? Sure, you say, perhaps he was kidnapped directly from the prison (as stupid as this sounds, anyway) - but then can you please explain (7)?
5) Is it also not interesting that the timecodes in the video jump back and forth?
6) Is it also not interesting that Berg did not exhibit any of the convulsions that typically accompany decapitation? http://www.ahsc.arizona.edu/uac/iacuc/rodents/avma.htm I am suggesting here that Berg was already dead when the decapitation occurred (which accounts for 5). Before you go calling me crazy, please review the evidence; why did he not exhibit the convulsions that go hand in hand with decapitation (especially such an extended one)?
7) Is it not curious that the US denies contact with Berg, and yet his friends and family insist that he told them he was being held by the US? Huh? Why?
Another tape oddity - the men SPEAK RUSSIAN for several seconds. Not only that, but they speak Arabic with Russian accents. That's right, in the final seconds of the tape, one of the men speaks in Russian. Those here who understand Russian (and have the stomach to view that final seconds of the video) can verify this. Those who speak Arabic will be able to verify that these men speak Arabic in Russian accents.
9) Finally (the physical evidence that will convince you in case you already aren't)...
You will notice, in watching the video, that 6 times, a gold ring flashes on the hand of the executioner. What is the problem? Islam completely and utterly forbids men to wear gold rings. This fanatical Muslim, willing to kill in a gut wrenching manner, and be killed for his beliefs, is violating one of the clear prohibitions of his religion? Really? DOES THIS MAKE SENSE TO YOU?
10) Nick Berg understands Arabic, but sits calmly while statement is read, waiting to be killed. Hmm?
11) One of the executioners is wearing Air Jordans. WHAT?
12) The "terrorists" signed the video, yet they wear hoods and masks. Why?
13) The "terrorists" have lily white hands.
14) The video time is in US Military English. What the hell?
MORE BEYOND THIS TO SAY ON THE CASE HERE:
The terrible and strange death of Nick Berg
By James Conachy
May 14, 2004, 07:48